038-Week Execution Calendar
Every week has a clear focus. Every activity has a "why." This is your operating rhythm.
Why Week 1 matters: This week is about getting the engine running. Not perfection. You need LinkedIn optimised, first connections sent, landing page fixes implemented, and the outreach cadence started. Speed beats perfection.
| Day | Channel | Activity | Time |
| Mon | LinkedIn | Optimise Doug's LinkedIn profile (new headline, about section, featured section). Connect with first 20 prospects from Week 1 list. | 90 min |
| Mon | Landing | Implement sticky bottom CTA bar on values.valuebull.com.au. Move benchmark interaction higher. | 60 min |
| Tue | LinkedIn | 20 more connection requests (Week 1 list). Comment on 10 ICP posts (30 min). | 60 min |
| Tue | Email | Set up Apollo.io. Import Week 1 CSV. Configure 3-email cold sequence. | 60 min |
| Wed | Content | Publish first LinkedIn post: "The 7 Deadly Sins of Company Values" (text post version). | 30 min |
| Wed | LinkedIn | 15 connection requests. Comment blitz (10 posts). | 45 min |
| Thu | Email | Launch first cold email batch (25-30 emails from Week 1 list). | 30 min |
| Thu | Google Ads | Review search terms report. Add negatives. Check CTR by ad group. | 20 min |
| Fri | Content | Publish second LinkedIn post: observation about broken values in a real company (anonymised). | 30 min |
| Fri | LinkedIn | 15 connection requests. Follow up with anyone who engaged with posts. | 45 min |
Week 1 Targets
- LinkedIn profile fully optimised
- 85 connection requests sent (Week 1 list started)
- 2 LinkedIn posts published
- Apollo.io configured with first email sequence
- First 25-30 cold emails sent
- Landing page sticky CTA implemented
- Google Ads search terms reviewed
Why Week 2 matters: Consistency compounds. This week establishes the posting rhythm that builds authority. You're also starting to see which connection messages get replies — double down on those.
| Day | Channel | Activity | Time |
| Mon | Content | Publish carousel post: "The 7 Deadly Sins of Company Values" (10-slide carousel). | 45 min |
| Mon | LinkedIn | 15 connections from Week 2 list. DM warm connections with VAS offer. | 45 min |
| Tue | LinkedIn | Comment blitz: 15 thoughtful comments on target prospect posts. | 30 min |
| Tue | Email | Send second batch of cold emails (30 more from Week 1+2 lists). | 20 min |
| Wed | Content | Publish text post: contrarian take — "Why most values workshops are a waste of money." | 30 min |
| Wed | LinkedIn | 15 connections. Follow up on replies from Week 1 connections. | 45 min |
| Thu | Google Ads | Weekly performance check. CTR, CPC, conversion tracking. Instagram campaign review. | 30 min |
| Thu | Email | Review cold email open rates and replies. Refine subject lines if needed. | 20 min |
| Fri | Content | Record 60-sec video: "The 10-second test that tells you if your values are working." | 30 min |
| Fri | LinkedIn | Cross-post carousel to Instagram. DM top 5 engaged prospects. | 30 min |
Week 2 Targets
- 3 LinkedIn posts published (carousel + text + video)
- 75 more connection requests sent
- 60+ cold emails sent total
- First DMs to warm connections
- At least 1-2 conversations started
Why Week 3 matters: You've been building visibility for 2 weeks. Now you accelerate. The free personalised VAS report becomes your nuclear weapon — a diagnostic they didn't ask for but can't ignore. This is where you start getting booked calls.
| Day | Channel | Activity | Time |
| Mon | Content | Carousel: "What a $72K Marketing Proposal Taught Us About Culture" (thought leadership positioning). | 45 min |
| Mon | LinkedIn | 20 connections from Week 3 list (Sydney focus). Send 2 personalised VAS reports to high-value targets. | 60 min |
| Tue | LinkedIn | Comment blitz: 15 targeted comments. This is the highest-ROI activity nobody does. | 30 min |
| Wed | Content | Text post: "Your company values weren't designed for your strategy. Here's why that matters." | 20 min |
| Wed | Email | Launch Week 3 email batch. Review and reply to all warm leads. | 30 min |
| Thu | Content | Video: Walk through a real (anonymised) VAS analysis. Screen-record dashboard, narrate. | 45 min |
| Thu | LinkedIn | 20 connections. Send 2 more personalised VAS reports. | 45 min |
| Fri | Content | Cross-post best content to Instagram + Facebook. | 20 min |
| Fri | Google Ads | Full Week 3 review. Compare old vs new landing page. Conversion data check. | 30 min |
Week 3 Targets
- 4 LinkedIn posts published
- 100 connection requests sent this week
- 4 personalised VAS reports sent to high-value prospects
- 5-10 qualified conversations happening
- First discovery call booked
Why Week 4 matters: You now have 3 weeks of organic data. Time to identify what's working and test a small paid amplification. The end-of-month review is critical — it determines where your money goes next month.
| Day | Channel | Activity | Time |
| Mon | Content | Carousel: "The 10-Second Test: Are Your Values Rules or Slogans?" | 45 min |
| Mon | LinkedIn Paid | Boost best-performing organic post as Sponsored Content ($10-15/day, 2 weeks). Target: Aus, 50-500, C-suite + HR. | 30 min |
| Tue | LinkedIn | Comment blitz + 20 connections (Week 4 list). Follow up all warm leads. | 60 min |
| Wed | Content | Text post: "Buy-in is not the same as usage. Here's why that matters for your values." | 20 min |
| Wed | Email | Week 4 email batch. Full nurture sequence review — what's converting? | 30 min |
| Thu | Content | Video: "What we learned from analysing 50 companies' values in 4 weeks." | 45 min |
| Fri | MONTH 1 REVIEW: Which content type got most engagement? Which outreach message got most replies? How many conversations → booked calls? Google Ads conversions? Instagram cost per lead? Kill what's not working. Double what is. | 90 min |
Why Week 5 matters: This is where it stops feeling like a sprint and starts feeling like a machine. From this week on, the cadence should feel automatic. You know what works. Now systematise it.
| Day | Activity |
| Mon | LinkedIn carousel (framework, insight, or case study) + 20 connections from Week 5 list + launch Week 5 email batch |
| Tue | Comment blitz (30 min, 15 targeted comments) + follow up warm leads + 2 personalised VAS reports |
| Wed | Text post (story, observation, or contrarian take) + 20 connections + reply to all DMs |
| Thu | Video (60-90 sec, phone-recorded) + Google Ads weekly review + email performance review |
| Fri | Cross-post best content to Instagram + Facebook + DM top 5 engaged prospects + week review |
Why Week 6 matters: You've been running on freshly written content for 5 weeks. This week you batch-create assets that keep the machine running while you focus on conversations. Build the library.
While maintaining the standard weekly rhythm, this week's additional focus:
- Build branded LinkedIn carousel template in Canva (reusable)
- Write 4 weeks of pre-written LinkedIn post copy
- Build "VAS Benchmark by Industry" one-pager PDF (lead magnet for LinkedIn lead gen forms)
- Create "Values Alignment Checklist for CEOs" PDF
- Review and optimise landing page based on 5 weeks of data
Why Week 7 matters: Before you ask for a bigger budget, you need proof. This week you build the business case for scaling to $2K-5K/month with confidence in returns.
Full Performance Review:
- Total leads generated across all channels
- Cost per lead by channel (LinkedIn organic, LinkedIn paid, Google Ads, Meta, cold email, direct outreach)
- Conversion rate: lead → booked call → qualified opportunity
- Best-performing content pieces and why
- Time investment per channel vs. return
Build the Business Case: "If we spend $X on [channel], we get Y leads, which converts to Z revenue."
Why Week 8 matters: You've proven the system. Now prepare to scale. This week sets up the infrastructure for $2K-5K/month spend with confidence.
- Build 12-week content calendar
- Set up email nurture sequence for leads who don't convert immediately (5-7 emails over 30 days)
- Create additional lead magnets: "Cost of Broken Culture Calculator"
- Plan LinkedIn ads scale: if $400/month works, test $800/month with expanded targeting
- Commission founder video content (or create together using AI tools)
- Full 8-week retrospective and Q3 plan
048-Week Content Schedule
Every post is pre-planned with topic, format, hook, and the strategic reason it exists. All written in the ValueBull voice: direct, confident, sharp, slightly provocative. Outlaw archetype — we challenge the status quo.
| Week | Day | Format | Topic / Hook | Why This Post |
| 1 | Wed | Text | "The 7 Deadly Sins of Company Values" | Establishes category authority. Names the problem everyone feels but can't articulate. |
| Fri | Text | "I audited 20 companies' values last month. 17 were running the wrong ones." | Social proof through activity. Creates curiosity about the VAS diagnostic. |
| | | |
| 2 | Mon | Carousel | "The 7 Deadly Sins of Company Values" (10 slides) | Carousels get 6.6% engagement on LinkedIn — highest of any format. Repurpose Week 1 text post. |
| Wed | Text | "Why most values workshops are a waste of money" | Contrarian take drives comments. Positions you as challenger, not consultant. |
| Fri | Video | "The 10-second test: Are your values working?" (60 sec) | Video shows personality. The 10-second test is your most shareable IP. |
| 3 | Mon | Carousel | "What a $72K Marketing Proposal Taught Us" | Vulnerability + business lesson. Shows you think differently. |
| Tue | — | Comment blitz (15 targeted comments) | Highest-ROI activity. Builds visibility without posting. |
| Wed | Text | "Your values weren't designed for your strategy. Here's why." | Core ValueBull thesis. Triggers strategic anxiety in CEOs. |
| Thu | Video | VAS dashboard walkthrough (screen record + narrate) | Shows the product is real. Creates demand for the free benchmark. |
| 4 | Mon | Carousel | "The 10-Second Test: Rules or Slogans?" | Interactive format. People share tests. Drives profile visits. |
| Wed | Text | "Buy-in is not the same as usage." | Reframe that makes HR leaders stop scrolling. Challenges the "engagement" orthodoxy. |
| Thu | Video | "What we learned from 50 companies in 4 weeks" | Authority through volume. Shows momentum. |
| Fri | Text | "Innovation is not a value. 'Test and learn to find a better way' is a rule." | The single most shareable reframe in your arsenal. LinkedIn gold. |
| 5 | Mon | Carousel | "3 Mantras > 5 Abstract Words" (ValueBull model explained) | Reveals the alternative. Moves from problem to solution. |
| Tue | — | Comment blitz (15 targeted comments) | Maintain visibility rhythm. |
| Wed | Text | "You cannot walk a noun. You can only walk an instruction." | Punchy, quotable, shareable. Pure Outlaw energy. |
| Thu | Video | "The say-do gap is not a culture issue. It's a definition issue." | Reframes the biggest complaint in HR/culture world. |
| 6 | Mon | Carousel | "What Happens When Strategy Changes But Values Don't" (case study) | Concrete example > abstract argument. Shows real consequences. |
| Wed | Text | "If your values were a product, would anyone use them twice?" | The Hormozi reframe. Makes values tangible to commercial operators. |
| Thu | Video | "The Values Alignment Score explained in 90 seconds" | Direct product education. Leads to landing page. |
| Fri | Text | "Your HRIS didn't fix culture. Your engagement platform didn't either." | "Do more with less" angle. Hits CFO + HR tension. |
| 7 | Mon | Carousel | "The Cost of Broken Culture Calculator" (data-driven) | Numbers make executives pay attention. Quantify the pain. |
| Wed | Text | "82% of employees say their company doesn't walk the talk. Here's the structural reason why." | Stat-driven authority. Positions you as diagnostician, not motivational speaker. |
| Thu | Video | "Our first 30 days building pipeline with $500" (honest founder story) | Vulnerability and authenticity. Founders love following the journey. |
| Fri | Text | "Values should not be statements. They should be rules of play." | Core positioning distilled to one sentence. |
| 8 | Mon | Carousel | "From Posters to Operating Code: Values in 2026" | Forward-looking positioning. Establishes you as the future of the category. |
| Wed | Text | "If you're going to revisit values this year, don't touch them until you've compared approaches." | Soft CTA. Creates urgency without being pushy. |
| Thu | Video | "8 weeks, 682 companies, and what we learned" (retrospective) | Closes the arc. Sets up the next phase with credibility. |
| Fri | Text | "The comparison between traditional values work and a Values Operating System usually answers the question on its own." | Confidence play. Lets the product sell itself. |
05Email Sequences (Ready to Send)
Sequence A: Cold Outreach (Load into Apollo)
3 emails over 10 days. Purpose: get a reply or a click to the benchmark.
Subject: Quick question about [Company]'s values
EMAIL 1 — Day 0 · Curiosity-driven · No pitch
Hi [First Name],
I've been looking at how mid-sized [industry] companies approach values and culture — and [Company] came up in our research.
We've built a diagnostic that scores how well a company's stated values actually align to their current business strategy. It takes 60 seconds and there's no data wall.
Out of genuine curiosity — when was the last time [Company] reviewed whether your values were still steering the team in the right direction?
If that's even remotely on the radar, you might find this useful:
[Get Your Values Alignment Score →]
No pitch, no call required. Just a score and a short interpretation.
Cheers,
Doug
Subject: The quiet reason execution drags
EMAIL 2 — Day 4 · Insight-led · Create tension
Hi [First Name],
Quick follow-up with something we've noticed across [industry].
When we run our Values Alignment Score across companies in your sector, a pattern shows up: most are running values that were designed for a different era or strategy. Not wrong. Just misaligned.
The result? Execution feels harder than it should. Managers interpret standards differently. Decisions escalate that shouldn't. Leaders end up repeating themselves.
Sound familiar? You're not alone — 4 in 5 companies we analyse score below 60 out of 100 on alignment.
If you're curious where [Company] sits, the benchmark takes 60 seconds:
[See Your Score →]
Doug
Subject: Last one from me — free VAS report for [Company]
EMAIL 3 — Day 10 · Direct offer · Low pressure close
Hi [First Name],
Last note — I'll keep it short.
We've been running personalised Values Alignment reports for companies like [Company] — using publicly available information to assess how well your stated values align to your strategy, brand positioning, and competitive context.
It's not millimetre-precise. But it's directionally powerful. And it's free.
If values, culture, or execution alignment is even partially on your agenda this year, this report usually answers whether there's something worth looking at.
Want me to run one for [Company]? Just reply "yes" and I'll send it across.
Cheers,
Doug
CEO, ValueBull
Sequence B: Post-VAS Nurture (7-Day Email Sequence)
For leads who complete the benchmark but don't book a call. Purpose: build trust, create urgency, get the call booked.
Subject: Your Values Alignment Score
EMAIL 0 — Instant · Score delivery + tension
Hi [First Name],
Here's your Values Alignment Score for [Company]: [SCORE] / 100
[Short 2-3 line interpretation based on score range]
What this usually means: companies scoring in this range tend to experience [specific symptom — e.g., "execution drag that shows up as inconsistent standards across teams and decisions escalating that shouldn't."]
If you'd like to see the full picture — including how your sector typically scores and the 3 structural corrections that tend to move the needle fastest — we offer a 20-minute walkthrough. No pitch. Just the analysis.
[Book Your 20-Minute Walkthrough →]
Cheers,
The ValueBull Team
Subject: Why most values programs fail (it's not what you think)
EMAIL 2 — Day 3 · Education · Build credibility
Hi [First Name],
After working with dozens of companies on their values, we've noticed a pattern.
Values programs don't fail because of bad intentions. They fail because values are treated like content — words on a wall — instead of infrastructure that people actually use.
There's a reason 7 out of 10 leaders admit their values are ineffective. It's a product design problem, not a motivation problem.
We built ValueBull to fix the product. Not run another workshop.
If that distinction resonates, here's a 20-minute conversation that might be worth your time:
[Book a Call →]
Doug
Subject: The 5 things that must be true before values do anything
EMAIL 4 — Day 5 · Framework reveal · IP tease
Hi [First Name],
Before values can drive culture, five things must be true:
1. Recall — Can people tell you what the values are without looking them up?
2. Clarity — Do they know what those values ask of them in action?
3. Individual Use — Are people personally using them, not just agreeing with them?
4. Team Use — Are teams using them in meetings, decisions, priorities?
5. Company Use — Are values visibly guiding company-level decisions?
If any of these five aren't locked, everything you build on top — onboarding, recruitment messaging, leadership storytelling — will keep underperforming.
This is where most organisations skip ahead and fail.
If this framework maps to something you're seeing at [Company], a 20-minute conversation might be useful:
[Book Your Walkthrough →]
Doug
Subject: Is this a priority for [Company] this year?
EMAIL 7 — Day 7 · Soft close · Respect their time
Hi [First Name],
Last email in this sequence — I'll keep it clean.
If values, culture alignment, or execution clarity is on your agenda for this year at [Company], here's the simplest next step:
[Book a 20-Minute Walkthrough →]
No pitch. We'll walk through your VAS analysis, show you how your sector typically scores, and outline the 3 structural corrections that tend to move the needle fastest.
If the timing's not right, no worries at all. We'll still be here when it is.
Cheers,
Doug
CEO, ValueBull
06LinkedIn Outreach Templates
These are connection request messages and follow-up DMs. Keep them short, human, and curiosity-driven. Never pitch on first contact.
Connection Request Messages
LinkedIn allows ~300 characters with connection requests. These are designed to get accepted, not to sell.
CONNECTION REQUEST — VARIANT A (Curiosity)
Hi [First Name] — I've been researching how mid-sized [industry] companies approach culture and values. [Company] came up. Would love to connect.
CONNECTION REQUEST — VARIANT B (Shared context)
Hi [First Name] — I work with 50-500 person companies on values alignment. Noticed [Company] is in a similar space to some companies we've been analysing. Keen to connect.
CONNECTION REQUEST — VARIANT C (Direct / no fluff)
[First Name] — we help mid-market companies figure out if their values are actually steering execution. Thought it'd be worth connecting. Doug, ValueBull.
CONNECTION REQUEST — VARIANT D (Melbourne-specific)
Hi [First Name] — Melbourne based, working with mid-sized companies on values and culture alignment. Saw [Company] and thought we might have some mutual interests. Keen to connect.
Follow-Up DM Sequences
These go to people who've accepted your connection. Space them 3-5 days apart.
DM 1 — Day 3 after accept (Value first, no ask)
Thanks for connecting, [First Name]. I've been looking at how companies in [industry] are approaching values and culture this year — some interesting patterns emerging. Happy to share anything useful if it's relevant for [Company].
DM 2 — Day 7 (Offer the benchmark)
Hey [First Name] — quick one. We've just launched a free values benchmark that shows how aligned a company's stated values are to their business strategy. Takes 60 seconds, no data wall. A few companies in [industry] have found it surprisingly revealing. Would you find that useful?
Here's the link if you're curious: [values.valuebull.com.au]
DM 3 — Day 12 (Personalised VAS offer)
[First Name] — one more thought. We've been running personalised Values Alignment reports for companies like [Company] using publicly available info. It benchmarks your values against your strategy, brand positioning, and sector norms.
Free, no strings. Want me to run one for [Company]? Takes us about a day to turn around.
DM 4 — Day 18 (Soft close)
Hey [First Name] — totally understand if the timing's off. If values or culture alignment comes up as a priority for [Company] this year, happy to have a quick 20-min conversation. No pitch — just walk you through what we're seeing in [industry]. Let me know if that'd be useful.
07LinkedIn Post Copy (Pre-Written)
Here are the first 8 posts, ready to copy-paste. Edit for your voice, publish, done.
Post 1 — "The 7 Deadly Sins of Company Values" (Text)
The 7 Deadly Sins of Company Values:
1. They're nouns, not instructions.
"Innovation" is an outcome. "Test and learn to find a better way" is a rule.
2. They're brand promises dressed up as culture.
You cannot walk a promise. You can only walk a behaviour.
3. Nobody can recall them.
If your team can't name them without looking, they're not operating.
4. They haven't changed since the strategy did.
You update strategy annually. Values? Every five years. Then expect them to execute each other.
5. They're launched, not installed.
Buy-in is not usage. A poster is not an operating system.
6. They're too safe.
If every company in your industry could claim the same values, they're not differentiating anything.
7. They don't tell anyone what to DO.
At [Company], we want you to _______. If your values can't finish that sentence, they're not working.
—
4 in 5 companies we analyse are running values misaligned to their strategy.
That's not a people problem. It's a product design problem.
If any of these hit home, we built a free 60-second benchmark:
🔗 values.valuebull.com.au
Post 2 — "I audited 20 companies" (Text)
I analysed the values of 20 mid-sized Australian companies last month.
17 were running the wrong ones.
Not "bad" values. Not offensive values. Not values anyone would disagree with.
The wrong values for where their business is actually going.
Here's what I mean:
Company A refreshed their strategy 8 months ago. Growth into new markets. Speed to market. Bold bets.
Their values? "Integrity. Excellence. Collaboration. Respect."
Those words are fine. They're just not steering anyone toward bold bets and speed.
So behaviour defaults to habit. And strategy drifts.
Not dramatically. Quietly.
This pattern shows up everywhere. Values created for a different era, a different strategy, a different game.
The game changed. The rules didn't.
If you're curious where your company sits, we built a free diagnostic:
🔗 values.valuebull.com.au
60 seconds. No data wall. Just your alignment score.
Post 3 — "Why most values workshops are a waste" (Text)
Unpopular opinion: most values workshops are a waste of money.
Not because the facilitators are bad.
Not because the leadership team doesn't care.
Not because people aren't engaged in the room.
They fail because they optimise for agreement instead of usage.
The output is always the same:
5 abstract words.
A poster.
A PDF.
A launch event.
Six months of fading relevance.
If your values were a product, would anyone use them twice?
Values are not a project. They're infrastructure.
Infrastructure is what people use when nobody is watching.
Stop treating values like a campaign.
Start treating them like a system.
Post 4 — "The 10-second test" (Video Script)
[60-second video script — record on phone, talking to camera]
HOOK (first 3 sec): "There's a 10-second test that tells you if your company values are actually working."
BODY: "Complete this sentence. At [your company], we want you to... blank. Now — does that instruction clearly reinforce your current strategy? If your values can't finish that sentence with something directional and actionable, they're not rules of play. They're just branding. You can't walk a noun. You can only walk an instruction."
CLOSE: "Try it with your actual values. If it doesn't land, that's the problem. Link in comments if you want to see your alignment score."
Post 5 — "Buy-in is not usage" (Text)
Buy-in is not the same as usage.
Here's why that distinction matters for your values.
Most values programs measure success by:
— How many people attended the launch
— Whether the survey scores went up
— Whether people "agree" with the values
That's buy-in. It's easy. It's also meaningless.
Usage looks different:
— Can people recall the values without looking them up?
— Do teams reference them in actual decisions?
— Do managers use them in performance conversations?
— Does anyone outside leadership mention them?
If you have buy-in but not usage, you have a marketing problem disguised as a culture win.
No product in the world would survive if adoption was assumed instead of engineered.
Your values are a product. Start treating them like one.
Post 6 — "Innovation is not a value" (Text)
"Innovation" is not a value.
"Test and learn to find a better way" is a rule.
"Integrity" is a virtue.
"Tell the truth early, even when it's uncomfortable" is a rule.
"Excellence" is an aspiration.
"When you know, you know — and when you know, you lead" is a rule.
"Collaboration" is a concept.
"Go far, go together" is a rule.
See the difference?
Brand words describe who you want to be seen as.
Values must define what you expect people to do.
That difference changes everything.
If your values read like a brand deck, they're not operating. They're decorating.
You cannot walk a noun.
You can only walk an instruction.
Post 7 — "You cannot walk a noun" (Text)
You cannot walk a noun.
You can only walk an instruction.
That single idea changes how you build company values.
Most companies pick 5 words: Innovation. Integrity. Excellence. Collaboration. Respect.
Then they wonder why 82% of employees say the company doesn't walk the talk.
It's not because people don't care. It's because they were never given a clear instruction.
You can't hold someone accountable to a word.
You can hold them accountable to a behaviour.
3 Mantras. 9 Ways of Working. Language teams can follow without interpretation.
That's what values look like when they work.
Clarity creates confidence.
Confidence creates execution.
If your values can't tell someone what to do under pressure, they're not rules of play.
They're furniture.
Post 8 — "If your values were a product" (Text)
If your values were a product, would anyone use them twice?
Serious question.
Think about it like this:
No product survives if:
— Users can't remember it
— Users don't know how to use it
— It's not designed into daily behaviour
— Adoption is assumed instead of engineered
Yet that's exactly how most companies treat their values.
Created through surveys and word-picking committees.
Launched with fanfare.
Forgotten within months.
Values are not a project. They are a product your people are supposed to use.
Fix the product. Not the marketing.
That's the shift that changes everything.